Add Row
Add Element
Meme Crypto News Logo
update
Meme Crypto News
update
Add Element
  • Home
  • Categories
    • Radar
    • Pulse
    • Security
    • Founder
    • Metrics
    • Launch
    • Tech
    • Political
    • Extra News
October 07.2025
3 Minutes Read

Infinex Challenges Traditional Security with Passkeys for Crypto DApps: Safe or Not?

Infinex bets on passkeys to access 100 crypto DApps — but is it safe?

The Evolution of Passwords: From Seed Phrases to Passkeys

Infinex is on the frontier of changing how users interact with decentralized finance (DeFi) applications by introducing passkeys as a login method for over 100 crypto decentralized applications (DApps). Rather than relying on the traditional, often cumbersome seed phrases that have been the standard since Bitcoin Improvement Proposal 39 in 2013, Infinex's approach to user security offers a more accessible experience for newcomers and seasoned users alike.

Kain Warwick, founder of Infinex, highlighted that navigating the complexities of seed phrase security has acted as a barrier for many potential crypto users. The introduction of passkeys provides a user-friendly alternative—security tied to biometric features on smartphones rather than cryptographic complexity. With this, transactions can be approved using facial recognition or fingerprints, making it easier for users to engage with their digital assets.

Comparing Security Protocols: Passkeys vs. Hardware Wallets

While the convenience of passkeys is appealing, a significant question arises: how do they compare in terms of security with dedicated hardware wallets such as Ledger and Trezor? According to reports, while passkey systems offer robust security protocols, hardware wallets remain nearly immune to hacking attempts, relying on secure enclaves that store private keys offline. In contrast, passkeys, although robust, can be vulnerable, especially if the user’s device is compromised or accessed physically by an attacker.

Infinex boasts a promising early adoption, securing half a billion dollars in total value locked (TVL) without incidents so far. However, experts caution that for large-scale holders of cryptocurrencies—what one might call 'Bitcoin whales'—the decentralization of security from hardware wallets should prompt a reevaluation of risk management strategies. For average users, however, this offering might strike the perfect balance between convenience and security.

The Slow Adoption of Passkeys in the Crypto Space

Despite their advantages, passkeys have not proliferated widely in the DeFi sector, which raises the question of user hesitance or industry resistance. Centralized exchanges like Binance and platforms such as Coinbase and Gemini have started embracing passkeys, yet many decentralized platforms remain more conservative, clinging to traditional methods of user authentication. This reluctance might be due to the broader industry's historical ties to seed phrases and a general wariness of shifting toward undeniably more user-friendly technologies.

The opportunity lies in effectively educating users about the security measures implemented around passkeys. Infinex's partnership with Turnkey ensures that private keys remain non-custodial, meaning neither Infinex nor its partners can access them. This feature could help allay fears about transitioning from seed phrases, especially when considering the persistent risks of phishing attacks that have plagued the crypto community for years.

The Future of Crypto Authentication: Possibilities and Predictions

As the cryptocurrency landscape continues to evolve, the question arises: will passkeys redefine the standard for crypto accessibility? The intuitive design of using existing biometric features from smartphones plays a huge part in broadening the user base. Perception shifts around crypto security practices are critical as new technologies emerge to replace outdated protocols.

In addition to providing easy recovery options, passkeys can be stored in trusted password managers and even safely synced across multiple devices, making them a practical step forward in the adoption of decentralized finance. However, the market must ensure consistent advancements in security measures to prevent misuse and facilitate broader acceptance in the financial mainstream.

Final Thoughts

Infinex is undeniably pushing the envelope in decentralized finance by introducing passkeys as the future of digital asset management. While there remain valid concerns about the comprehensive security offered by passkeys compared to traditional hardware wallets, the potential for increasing accessibility to both new and seasoned crypto users is enormous. Embracing these innovations while remaining vigilant against security risks will be essential as the crypto landscape continues to mature.

Extra News

2 Views

0 Comments

Write A Comment

*
*
Related Posts All Posts
11.14.2025

Alibaba Adapts to China's Stance on Stablecoins with New Deposit Token

Update Alibaba’s Strategic Move Amid Regulatory Scrutiny In a bold response to the ongoing regulatory environment surrounding stablecoins in mainland China, Alibaba is reportedly developing a bank-backed deposit token aimed at enhancing cross-border payment efficiencies. This strategic pivot comes as Beijing intensifies its crackdown on stablecoins, a move that underscores the government's desire to maintain strict control over digital currency ecosystems. Understanding Deposit Tokens vs. Traditional Stablecoins Deposit tokens, as Alibaba plans to utilize, represent a direct claim on deposits held at regulated banks. They bear similarities to traditional stablecoins, which are private entities backed by various assets to maintain value. However, the crucial difference lies in their regulatory treatment, as deposit tokens function as recognized liabilities of the issuing banks, aligning with governmental oversight. This shift could signify a new model for secure and compliant cross-border transactions, positioning Alibaba at the forefront of this emerging space. The Larger Implications of China’s All-Out War on Stablecoins Chinese authorities have voiced substantial concerns regarding stablecoins that could be exploited for illicit activities, prompting a series of stringent regulations. This environment discourages both domestic and international players from launching stablecoins within China's borders. Recently, Alibaba rivals, including Ant Group and JD.com, also paused their stablecoin initiatives after similar government interventions raised alarms about private sector-controlled digital currencies. Such regulatory pressures may slow the pace of decentralized finance (DeFi) growth within the region and signal a significant shift in how tech giants navigate digital currency dynamics. The Future of Digital Currency in China: Controlled but Evolving While the prospect of onshore stablecoins appears dim, China's interest in digital currency innovation persists. Recent developments indicate efforts are leaning towards offshore yuan stablecoins targeting foreign markets, particularly in connection to the Belt and Road Initiative. Analysts suggest that mainstream adoption of stablecoins within China remains unlikely, yet innovations in digitized financial instruments could thrive under regulated frameworks. The international community watches closely as developments unfold, particularly given the potential impact on cryptocurrency market infrastructures worldwide. Final Thoughts on Alibaba’s New Token Strategy Alibaba's consideration of a deposit token, juxtaposed against the backdrop of China's ongoing regulatory crackdowns, evidences a significant tension between innovation and regulation. As the tech giant navigates this complex landscape, its actions could set precedents for the future of digital currencies both regionally and globally. Institutions and investors must remain vigilant as these developments explore the balance between compliance and technological advancement.

11.13.2025

Bitcoin's Resistance at $106K: What Whales' Actions Indicate for Investors

Update The Bitcoin Whales' Recent Movements: Insights into Market DynamicsIn recent weeks, Bitcoin (BTC) has witnessed significant activity among its largest holders, often termed ‘whales.’ Accumulation movements from these entities have been characterized by a pronounced surge, with Bitcoin whales amassing over 45,000 BTC, leading to thoughts of potential market recovery. Despite this, the price has struggled, hitting a resistance wall just above $106,000. What does this mean for the broader market and for investors who might be considering their next steps?Understanding the Whale Impact on Bitcoin PricesWhales have been pivotal in shaping the fortunes of Bitcoin, particularly during volatile periods. As noted by analysts, this recent accumulation represents the second-largest weekly influx in 2025. Whale actions often indicate market trends; however, it's important to recognize that they can also lead to significant fluctuations in Bitcoin's price. The price rebound from a low of $98,900 to around $107,500 is a clear sign that market sentiment can shift rapidly. But the failure to break the crucial $106,000 support offers vital lessons for traders. More notably, outflows from prominent long-term holders might indicate waning confidence and foreshadow underlying market weaknesses.The Role of Long-Term Holders and Market SentimentWhile whales have been buying, some significant players—like Owen Gunden—have continued to sell their substantial holdings. This divergence in whale activity poses questions about the broader sentiment among long-term holders. If large volumes are being transferred to exchanges, could it signal a lack of faith in a sustained price recovery? Analysts suggest that the combined pressure from long-term holders could stall the projected bullish momentum, indicating that situations where some are selling while others are accumulating create a complex market dynamic.The Significance of Resistance LevelsThe noted resistance between $106,000 and $107,000 is far more than just a number; it represents a psychological barrier that traders frequently monitor. Analysts argue that to truly capitalize on an upward trend, Bitcoin must flip this resistance into support. If the push unfolds successfully, targets of beyond $110,000 could become realistic. However, current trends suggest a strong overhang of selling pressure in this zone that could inhibit attempts to break free.Market Trends: What Lies Ahead?Using data visualization tools such as Glassnode’s cost basis distribution heatmap can give traders better insights into potential outcomes. The density of Bitcoin holdings in the current resistance zone suggests that many visualized price levels could prompt profit-taking behavior. For Bitcoin to sustain higher price levels, there needs to be an influx of new capital from retail traders and day traders—entities that can invigorate trading volumes and assist in controlling selling pressure.Final Thoughts: The Future of Bitcoin Amid ResistanceAs the current market stands, it appears that Bitcoin's trajectory hangs in a delicate balance. Whales are positioned to wield significant influence over how this narrative unfolds, yet their movements serve as both indicators and potential disruptors of market sentiment. Having a keen understanding of these dynamics is crucial for any investor considering their approach. Whether you are a whale or a small investor, comprehending these movements can pave the path for well-informed trading decisions. The interplay between accumulation and selling will undoubtedly dictate Bitcoin's ability to push through resistance levels in the coming days.

11.13.2025

Institutions Must Stake Ether on Decentralized Infrastructure to Ensure Network Security

Update Why Institutions Should Stake Ether on Decentralized Infrastructure As Ethereum matures into the backbone of decentralized finance, a significant opportunity awaits institutions in the staking ecosystem. Recent shifts to a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) model not only promise improved scalability and reduced energy consumption, but also furnish serious investors with a pathway toward a more engaged role within this revolutionary network. Yet, merely seeking to maximize returns while adhering to traditional financial paradigms may lead to failure against the decentralized ethos Ethereum embodies. Cautionary Tales from History History offers us cautionary insights that institutions must heed. The dot-com bubble stands as a poignant example; it burst after many rushed in without a grasp on the technical scaffolding underlying the internet revolution. Today's institutions must avoid a similar fate while navigating the intricacies of Ethereum staking. The balance lies in recognizing that participation extends beyond simple economic gain to encompass a responsibility towards the network’s health and decentralization. The Importance of Staking Ether Staking ETH represents a dual opportunity: institutions can earn staking rewards while bolstering the network's security. More than just a financial mechanism, staking operates on the principle of validators—who lock up their ETH to ensure the integrity of the network. They earn rewards for successful validations, but they incur penalties for malicious actions or failures, thus creating an environment of accountability. Embracing Distributed Validator Technology (DVT) To effectively manage the new challenges of scaling ETH staking, institutions must embrace innovative technologies such as Distributed Validator Technology (DVT). DVT decentralizes validator duties across multiple nodes, ensuring no single point of failure. This technology increases resilience against potential threats of centralization, which could undermine the Ethereum network. It positions institutions to contribute to robust validator performance, maintaining decentralized representation across various geographic locations. Risk Mitigation through Smart Practices Effective risk management is paramount, as illustrated by operational strategies employed in leading validator operations. Institutions, like those managing ETH on behalf of their clients, must prioritize safety over liveness. They should also diversify their client use to mitigate supermajority risks, where malfunctions could halt system operations. Benchmarking against broader network performance can identify operational inefficiencies and foster an environment of constant improvement. The Role of Regulation in Institutional ETH Staking Regulatory clarity has emerged as a make-or-break factor for institutional engagement in Ethereum staking. The European Union's Markets in Crypto-assets (MiCA) framework aims to provide guidelines that assure institutions of compliance and security as they engage with the decentralized network. Furthermore, advancements such as the Shanghai-Capella hard fork offer greater liquidity for staked assets, resolving concerns surrounding capital accessibility. Fostering Future Growth for Ethereum The collective influx of institutional stakeholders into the Ethereum ecosystem poses potential transformative impacts. Not only does it enhance market liquidity and promote deeper engagement, but it also reinforces the integrity and resilience of the network itself. Addressing around 29% of staked ETH currently held by centralized exchanges, institutions are called to adopt decentralized staking practices, ensuring the sustainability of the Ethereum network as a decentralized financial leader. Conclusion: Taking Action in the Ethereum Space As Ethereum evolves, a call to action for institutions rings clear: engagement in ETH staking must prioritize network health and decentralized practices, streamlined by DVT and guided by regulatory measures. By taking decisive steps within this innovative framework, institutions can cement their presence in the dynamic world of decentralized finance while safeguarding their assets and contributing to the broader blockchain revolution.

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Core Modal Title

Sorry, no results found

You Might Find These Articles Interesting

T
Please Check Your Email
We Will Be Following Up Shortly
*
*
*